Legal Opinion
Phoenix Phase I Associates v. Ginsberg, Guren & Merritt
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 1985No. 48498PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
This action, originally filed in 1975, involves a comprehensive and complex real estate transaction in which the law firm of Ginsberg, Guren & Merritt was retained to provide a wide range of professional services. In the fall of 1973, however, the transaction began experiencing problems, and by the spring of 1974, it was in a shambles.
The complaint filed in the case alleged that Ginsberg, Guren & Merritt committed malpractice in the course of rendering legal services regarding the transaction. Specifically, the complaint stated that the law firm failed to have a title search made, failed to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- International Insurance Company v. Stonewall Insurance Company and Crown Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Woods v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Desantis v. SmedleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- International Insurance v. Stonewall InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.