Legal Opinion
Roe v. Doe
New York City Family Court
Decided October 26, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelipe N. Torres, J.
This is a motion made by the petitioner to set aside the dismissal of the petition, and to set the case down for a trial on the issue of paternity. A cross motion has been made by the respondent to dismiss petitioner’s motion on the ground of defective service of the motion papers and insufficiency in law.
Before going into a discussion of the two motions and as a background to the issues raised by them, it will be convenient to review the proceedings heretofore had in the case. On or about December 7, 1962, the petitioner filed in this court a *876paternity petition in which she alleged in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- ABC v. XYZNew York City Family Court · 1966
- Apex Binding Corp. v. RelkinNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Melchers v. BertolidoNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- Harlem Metal Corp. v. SegalCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Storm v. NoneNew York City Family Court · 1968
- In re Carmen R.New York City Family Court · 1984
- Hesse v. HrubsaSuffolk County District Court · 1968
- Shan F. v. Francis F.New York City Family Court · 1976
- Petit v. RatnerNevada Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.