Petit v. Ratner

*422OPINION

Appellant Kathie Petit here attacks the district court’s decision that NRS 126.280 bars her motion for an increase in child support.1 Petit originally sued respondent Ratner upon a paternity complaint in September, 1974. The case ended in a judgment pursuant to a “Stipulation” signed only by Petit’s counsel.

That stipulation, which recognized Ratner as the father, provided for child support of $50 per month, and for medical expenses of $596.70. Ratner contends such stipulation was an agreement pursuant to NRS 126.280. Thus, he urges, the court correctly determined that he had “bought…