Legal Opinion

Apex Binding Corp. v. Relkin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

The plaintiff is a tenant of premises owned by the defendant. In October, 1947, defendant agreed to rent a floor for commercial purposes in premises at 70-72 Wooster Street, New York City. At that time and since, the premises were subject to the Commercial Bent Law (see L. 1945, eh. 3, and amendments thereof). According to the complaint, and for the purposes of this motion, it must be conceded that the emergency rent is a sum much less than $416.67 per month; that the landlord refused to rent the premises at the emergency rent; whereupon the landlord and the plaintiff entered into an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Underhill v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Ross v. PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1966
  2. Consolidated Mercantile Industries, Inc. v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Laurel Printing Co. v. Starrett Realty Renting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Jabe Estates Inc. v. Real Curtains Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API