Legal Opinion
Calzavara v. Biehl & Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1966No. 2017PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
181 So.2d 809 (1966)
Alberto CALZAVARA
v.
BIEHL & COMPANY, Inc.
No. 2017.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
January 10, 1966.
Wilmer G. Hinrichs, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.
Monroe & Lemann, Nigel E. Rafferty, Malcolm L. Monroe, and C. King Mallory, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.
Before McBRIDE, SAMUEL and CHASEZ, JJ.
SAMUEL, Judge.
This is a suit for damages, allegedly both ex contractu and ex delicto, arising out of a contract of passage on board an Italian vessel. It is brought under the "saving to suitors" clause in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1333. Plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Iordanis Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Hatzoglou v. Asturias Shipping Company, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Muoio v. Italian LineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Cook v. AAA Worldwide Travel AgencyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- CHIN SEE FUN v. Louisville & NR Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- United States ex rel. Ray Gains, Inc. v. Essential Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Calzavara v. Biehl & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.