Legal Opinion
Calzavara v. Biehl & Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1969No. 3303PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his suit against Biehl & Company, Inc. (“Biehl”) on an exception of prescription based on the ground that it was not instituted within the six-month period provided by the passage contract between plaintiff and Societá Italiana di Armamento (“Sidarma”) which Biehl issued to plaintiff as agent for Sidarma.
Biehl also appeals from the dismissal of its third-party demand against Sidarma on a similar prescription exception.
Plaintiff’s petition alleges that Sidarma authorized Biehl to provide him passage from New Orleans to an Italian port…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Calzavara v. Biehl & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- The MajesticDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kerr v. Jefferson Truck LinesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Blouin v. Loyola UniversityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- The Norbert Simmons Irrevocable Trust A/K/A the Norbert Simmons Irrevocable Trust of 4109 Annunciation St., New Orleans, La 70115 v. Flag Boy Properties, LLC A/K/A Flag Boy Properties, LLC of 5500 Prytania St. Pmb440, New Orleans, La 70115Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023