Legal Opinion

CHIN SEE FUN v. Louisville & NR Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1977No. 7834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

344 So.2d 8 (1977)

CHIN SEE FUN

v.

LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY et al.

No. 7834.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

February 15, 1977.

Rehearing Denied April 13, 1977.

Writ Refused June 3, 1977.

Curet & Curet, Douglas T. Curet, LeRoy R. Curet, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bruce J. Borrello, Stephen L. Huber, Robert A. Katz, George J. Richaud, A. Miles Pratt, III, Metairie, for defendants-appellees.

Before SAMUEL, REDMANN and BEER, JJ.

BEER, Judge.

Appellant, Chin See Fun, brought suit against Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company (hereafter "L&N"), John Doe and XYZ…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Majesty v. Comet-Mercury-Ford Co. of Lorain, Mich.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. BringolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Calzavara v. Biehl & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Hollingsworth v. General Accident & Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Gustin v. ShowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Kerr v. Jefferson Truck LinesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Foster v. Manville Forest Products Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Nathan v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API