Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Maine-Endwell Central School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert A. Harlem, J.
This is a motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 for reargument of the denial of a motion to dismiss. The dismissal motion was grounded upon the one-year limitation period prescribed by Education Law § 3813 (2-b). The denial followed from the conclusion that the limitation period was intended to be given prospective application only and that the plaintiff’s claim was subject to the six-year limitation period for contract actions (CPLR 213 [2]).
Since that decision, the Appellate Division, Third Department, in McGuirk v City School Dist. of City of Albany (116 *1127AD2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & WexlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Durkin v. SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Alston v. Transport Workers UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Glod v. Ashland Chemical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1989
- Davis v. Isaacson, Robustelli, Fox, Fine, Greco & Fogelgaren, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.