Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 15, 1991No. 7913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after a jury found her guilty of the crimes of sale of a narcotic substance by a person who was not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a), conspiracy to sell a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 21a-277 (a), and possession of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied her motion in limine that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. SmartConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. MezriouiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Dichello v. Holgrath Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API