Legal Opinion

State v. Mezrioui

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 21, 1992No. 9836PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) and sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1) (B). In this appeal, the defendant claims (1) that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he violated either of the sexual assault statutes charged, (2) that both § 53a-70 (a) and § 53a-72a (a) (1) (B), as applied to the facts of this case, are unconstitutionally vague, (3) that the prohibition against double jeopardy was…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RummerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Lester v. Resort Camplands International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. State v. NitaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. State v. BattistaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API