Legal Opinion

People v. Ranger Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 2002No. B150125PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

A trialcourt prematurely entered summary judgment against appellant Ranger Insurance Company, a bail bond surety, before the extended 180-day period provided by Penal Code sections 1305 and 1305.4 had expired. After appellant’s motion to set aside the summary judgment was denied, appellant appealed. We reverse with directions.

Background

On July 2, 1999, a criminal complaint was filed charging Meynor Mejia with two felony counts of possession of narcotics for sale and one misdemeanor count of falsely representing himself to a police officer. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351.5,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. American Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Nobel InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. American Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. Granite State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. Alistar InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Company, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API