Legal Opinion
People v. Alistar Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 2004No. E033242PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.—Defendants
Defendants and appellants Alistar Insurance Company and Ray’s Bail Bonds (collectively, Alistar) appeal from an order denying their motions to extend the 180-day forfeiture period for two bail bonds, and from the summary judgment on bail forfeiture granted in favor of the People of the State of California.
Alistar contends it provided sufficient evidence showing good cause for granting Alistar additional time to locate the defendant, Rodrigo Gamez, and return him to custody. We agree and reject the People’s contention that denial of the motions was justified due to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- County of Los Angeles v. Nobel InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. Ranger Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- County of Los Angeles v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Lexington National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.