Legal Opinion
In Re Santos
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1928No. Docket No. 1016PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The petitioner was tried and convicted of unlawfully transporting garbage through the streets of the city of Sacramento in violation of Ordinance No. 146, fourth series, of said city, and filed his application herein for a writ of habeas corpus, and as a reason for his discharge alleges that section one of said ordinance is unconstitutional in that it deprives a private person of his property without due process of law.
The ordinance in question provides for the disposal of garbage and its transportation through the streets of the city of Sacramento only by duly authorized persons. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gardner v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Valley Spring Hog Ranch Co. v. PlagmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- In Re ZhizhuzzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Glass v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re PedrosianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Matula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Silver v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.