Legal Opinion
Ditto v. RE/MAX Preferred Properties, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 8, 1993No. 78868, 79173PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellants in this interlocutory appeal challenge the trial court’s order denying their motion to compel arbitration, and to stay appellee’s district court suit pending completion of arbitration.
Sandy Ditto began working for appellant RE/MAX Preferred Properties, Inc. (“RE/ MAX”) in April, 1990. RE/MAX is a local franchisee of a national real estate brokerage organization.
In the fall of 1990, Ditto signed an “Independent Contractor’s Agreement” [“the Agreement”] with RE/MAX. Appellant Norma Coppedge signed the Agreement on behalf of RE/MAX as “Broker.”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Board of Education v. W. Harley Miller, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Voss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- R.W. Roberts Construction Co. v. St. Johns River Water Management District ex rel. McDonald Electric & Repair Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Painters Dist. Council No. 33 v. MoenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles S. Barker Express Golf, Inc. v. Golf U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
- Sehulster Tunnels/Pre-Con v. Traylor Brothers, Inc./Obayashi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- HAROLD ALLEN'S MOBILE HOME OUTLET, INC. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.