Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
Up to now the Court has not squarely confronted this question: Is a private agreement to submit future disputes to statutory arbitration binding on a party to the contract who now prefers court resolution over arbitration?
Rollings, the patent holder of a design of a new industrial water heater, entered into a contract with Thermodyne to manufacture the water heater. The contract stated “[I]n the event of any dispute between the parties hereto relating to this Agreement, the parties hereby agree to arbitrate such dispute under the rules, regulations and guidelines of the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Voss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Braun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Bruner v. Timberlane Manor Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.