Legal Opinion

Kingsbury v. Nye

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1908No. Civ. No. 573PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the state controller. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Mandate. The petition shows that at the general election held in this state on November 3, 1906, petitioner was duly elected to the office of surveyor general for the term of four years from and after the first Monday in January, 1907; that he duly qualified and thereupon became such officer, entered upon the discharge of his duties as such, ever since has been and now is the duly elected and qualified surveyor general, and now is entitled to receive the salary and emoluments of the said office; that at the regular session of the legislature commencing January 7, 1907, an amendment to section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. County of Yolo v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In re OliverezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Chenoweth v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Johnston v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API