State ex rel. Breeden v. Lewis
Utah Supreme Court
Original action in quo walranto instituted by the Attorney-General, on bebalf of the State, to oust the defendant, from the office of district judge of the Third Judicial District.
1Opinion of the CourtBaetch, J.
In this case the Attorney-General filed an information in the nature of quo warranto, demanding that the defendant be ousted from the office of district judge of the Third Judicial District. This is an original proceeding in this court. The information states that the defendant was, on April 7, 1903, appointed to the office, by the Governor, in pursuance of an act entitled “An act to increase the number of judges for the Third Judicial District and for the appointment of one judge, pending the next general election, ’ ’ which was approved March 12, 1903 (Sess. Laws 1903, p. 50, *122c. 55); that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kimball v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Wells v. TingeyUtah Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- State ex rel. West v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Duke v. GrahamUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- American Bush v. City of South Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Marioneaux v. CutlerUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Hansen v. Public Employees Retirement System Board of AdministrationUtah Supreme Court · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.