Hansen v. Public Employees Retirement System Board of Administration
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
John Hansen and his employer, Salt Lake County, joined as plaintiffs herein to challenge the validity of Chapter 21, Laws of Utah 1951, Special Session. The purpose of that act, stated generally, was to repeal the laws relating to the State Retirement System, liquidate it, and transfer public employees to coverage under the Federal Social Security Act as permitted by the Social Security Act Amendments of 1950, 42 U. S. C. A. § 301 et seq.
The plaintiffs assert that the Repeal Act is invalid because:(1) It attempts to abrogate vested rights of Hansen;(2) It is unreasonably…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Baker v. MathesonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Gossman v. State Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Kent Club v. TorontoUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Parkinson v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Starkey v. Board of Education of Davis County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.