Legal Opinion

Guardian National Bank v. Huntington County State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1933No. 26,394PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Action by appellant to recover upon four checks aggregating $55,000.00, drawn by the Steinbrenner Rubber Company upon appellee, Huntington County State Bank. Trial by jury and judgment for appellees, from which this appeal is taken. Appellant assigns as error the overruling of its motion for a new trial. The questions presented involve the suf ficiency of the evidence, the giving of and refusal to give certain instructions, and the admissibility of one item of evidence. There is no conflict in the evidence except as to one matter, to which we will hereafter refer.

Appellant and the appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mactier's Administrators v. FrithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Purviance v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Barrett v. DodgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890
  5. New v. Germania Fire InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keller v. Frederickstown Savings InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Romain v. A. Howard Wholesale Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Karvalsky v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Morrison v. ThoelkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. W. F. Sebel Co., Inc., in the Matter of Mario John Benedetti, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API