Legal Opinion

Purviance v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1889No. 13,778PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The only question presented on this appeal is, whether or not the facts found support the conclusion that a certain note filed by John D. Jones against the estate of Joseph W. Pur.vianee, deceased, had been duly executed by the intestate in his lifetime. It appeal’s that the intestate received $1,525.98 in August, 1873, as the proceeds of the sale of a quantity of wheat sold by him belonging to Jones, who was his son-in-law. Purviance requested permission to use the money for a short time. Jones consented.

The court found, as a fact, that about the year 1880, or perhaps prior thereto, Jones…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weber v. ChristenIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stone v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Scobey v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Jones v. MayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Garrigue v. KellarIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API