Legal Opinion

Romain v. A. Howard Wholesale Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1987No. 82A01-8609-CV-248PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Robert C. Romain and Ronald D. Romain (Romains), defendants-appellants, appeal an order of the Vanderburgh Superior Court, directing them to specifically perform an option contract for the purchase and sale of certain realty entered into with the plaintiff-appellee, A. Howard Wholesale Company (Howard). The Romains contend that Howard failed to properly exercise the option before its expiration.

We agree, and reverse.

The dispute revolves around the language of paragraph two of the option. The option reads in relevant part, as follows:

1. Granting of Option: In consideration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kokomo Veterans, Inc. v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Robison v. Fickle, Extr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Scott v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Barney v. Yazoo Delta Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Arlington State Bank v. ColvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Donald R. Rollins v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Salin Bank and Trust Co. v. Violet U. Peden TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Battershell v. Prestwick Sales, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API