Legal Opinion

Kari v. City of Maplewood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1998No. C8-97-823PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

We consider once again whether the complex concept of official immunity applies to the conduct of a government official — here in the context of a public employee driving an emergency vehicle in response to an emergency call. Paul Everson, a paramedic employed by respondent City of Maplewood, was driving an emergency vehicle to the scene of a medical emergency when his vehicle struck appellant Lillian Helena Kari as she crossed the street in a marked crosswalk. In Kari’s suit for personal injuries, the district court granted Everson’s and the city’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jeffrey M. Kuha v. City of Minnetonka William Roth Kevin Anderson Dennis WaroshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Jeremy Nelson v. County of Wright James R. HudekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Kyle Rusness v. Becker County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  5. Dokman v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API