Legal Opinion
In re Joslyn
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The first and second defenses in the answer of Universal Laboratories, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “ Corporation ” and the first defense in .the answer of tKe transfer agent are founded upon an erroneous interpretation of section 113 of the Stock Corporation Law. The provision of that section permitting inspection by a stockholder of record for at least six months immediately preceding his demand does not require that the inspection be made by the- stockholder personally. Such a construction would unduly penalize a crippled or blind stockholder unable to make the inspection himself,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Schulman v. Louis Dejonge & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Matter of Ackerman v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Noel Associates, Inc. v. MerrillNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Doherty v. McElligottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Alabama Gas Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Murchison v. Alleghany Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Wood, Walker & Co. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
- Avallon v. Riverside Democrats, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.