Legal Opinion

Matter of Ackerman v. Kern

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1939PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crane, Ch. J.

In Matter of Kraus v. Singstad (275 N. Y. 302) this court called attention to the fact that section 19 of the Laws of 1931, chapter 798, was unconstitutional, in that it provided that the clerical and other assistants employed, or to be employed, by the temporary Emergency Relief Administration should not be subject to the provisions of the Civil Service Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 7), as might be necessary for the administration of home relief. Recognizing that the emergency might require temporary employment without examination, we held that the Constitution required competitive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Kraus v. SingstadNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Matter of Britt v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Auer v. DresselNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Rockwell v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Murray v. McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Doherty v. McElligottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API