Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

This case involves a dispute between a motor vehicle insurer and a health insurer over which company should pay for the medical treatment of a common insured who was injured in an automobile accident. The two insurers agree that under G. L. c. 90, § 34A (defining “[pjersonal injury protection”), the first $2,000 in medical costs are to be paid out of the personal injury protection (PIP) benefits available under the mandatory provisions of the automobile insurance policy. They part company, however, in answering the question at the heart of this case: whether a health insurer may defer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Allstate Insurance v. BearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Goodman v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Niles v. Boston Rent Control AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Golchin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Golchin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Ivey v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  4. Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Bosquet v. Commerce Insurance CompanyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API