Heermance v. James
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order made at a special term, overruling a demurrer of the defendant, to the plaintiff's complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Potter, J.
The complaint charges, that the defendant, “ contriving and wickedly and unjustly intending to injure the plaintiff, and to deprive him of the affections, comfort, fellowship, society and assistance of Eachel, his wife, did, at, &c. wrongfully and unlawfully purpose, plan and undertake to alienate the affections of his (the plaintiff's) said wife, and did then and there, for the accomplishment of such purpose,'' (by various professions and pretenses set forth,) “and by false insinuations against the plaintiff) and by other insidious wiles, so prejudice and poison the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hutcheson v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Schuneman v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Barnes v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Fritz v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Adams v. MainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.