Legal Opinion

Adams v. Main

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1892No. 306PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reinhard, J. —

The appellee sued the appellant for debauching his wife. Originally the complaint was in one paragraph, and in it there was a charge of adultery.

After the issues had been closed and the trial entered upon, the appellee, by leave of court, filed a second paragraph of complaint, from which the charge of carnal knowledge was omitted, and which declared simply upon an alienation, by the appellant, of the affections of the appellee's wife. No demurrer was filed to either paragraph.

*234Issues were joined, the cause was tried by a jury, and there was a verdict in favor of the appellee on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Tice v. MandelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rott v. GoehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API