Legal Opinion

Hanna Paint Manufacturing Company, D/B/A Hanna Paint Mfg. Co. Of Texas, as Intervener v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1962No. 6820PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

The original action, a Miller Act case, was here before upon its merits and affirmed. 1 A part of the history of the litigation is recorded in that opinion, but some additional facts concerning this phase of the case are necessary for the disposition of our questions.

The litigation was commenced in 1957, sometime after appellees were employed as counsel for the original plaintiffs. After issue, the case was tried and appellees’ clients obtained a substantial judgment. Appellees were required to resist an appeal from that judgment, which judgment was first vacated and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prichard v. FulmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Webster v. SweatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Wyoming Ry. Co. v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Frink v. McCombU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1894
  5. Graeber v. McMullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Oppenlander v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
  2. Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone v. Max BarashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In Re King Resources Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API