Legal Opinion

Prichard v. Fulmer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1916No. 1812PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County; E. L. Mecller, Judge. . Action by George W. Prichard against J. H. Fulmer, Jr., and another. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. In absence of statute, attorney has equitable lien.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County; E. L. Mecller, Judge. . Action by George W. Prichard against J. H. Fulmer, Jr., and another. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. In absence of statute, attorney has equitable lien. Mosley v. Norman, 74 Ala. 424; Andrews v. Morse, 12 Conn. 444; Carter v. Davis, 8 Fla. 183; J ones v. Groover, 46 Ga. 568; Hunt v. McClanahan, 48 Tenn. 503; Filmore v. Wells, 15 Pac. -343. Contract for payment of attorney’s fee is enforcible at common, law. 27 Cyc. of Pro. 1781, 1785. As to attorneys’ liens general^, see: Porter et al. v. Hansum, 36 Ark.…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

ROBERTS, C. J.

Appellant was employed by Jacob H. Fulmer, Jr., as attorney, to foreclose three certain mortgages on described real estate, executed to him by the Eagle Mining & Improvement Company to secure an indebtedness of $112,000, represented by promissory notes. Suit was filed pursuant to such employment on January 1st, 1909, and on May 9, 1909, final .decree was entered. This decree, after finding that the notes representing the indebtedness, secured by the mortgage, were past due and unpaid, and giving judgment for the amount due, further provided:

“And it is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. President of the Michigan State Bank v. HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Cowen v. BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Keehn v. KeehnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Stewart v. FlowersMississippi Supreme Court · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Ray M. Vargas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Hanna Paint Manufacturing Company, D/B/A Hanna Paint Mfg. Co. Of Texas, as Intervener v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & RobbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & Lawless P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Norrell v. ChasanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  5. Northern Pueblos Enterprises. v. MontgomeryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API