Application of Williams
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Judge.
This-is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claim 2 in appellant’s application for a patent on a lac-tone. The method claims by which the lactone, called for in appealed claim 2, may be produced, were allowed by the examiner.
The appealed claim reads as follows: “2.® The laevo rotary form of «-hydroxy- Bt B -dimethyl- y-butyro lactone substantially free from the dextro rotary form.”
The following references were relied on by the Patent Office tribunals:
Monatschefte fur…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re MerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Farbenfabriken of Elberfeld Co. v. KuehmstedU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Application of KebrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of Sune Bergstrom and Jan SjovallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Kenneth B. CoferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.