Ruckinger v. Weicht
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
TAMILIA, Judge:
This is an appeal from an Order dismissing appellant’s action in mandamus.
Appellant posted bail of $8,500 in cash, ten per cent of the named bail for his son. Under Blair County court Rule 481, appellant was required to sign an agreement allowing the bail money to be used to pay any costs, fines or restitution which may result from the charges against his son.
Appellant’s son was found guilty and fined over $2,500. His appeal on that case is pending. While the son remained free on bail he was arrested and incarcerated on other charges. The appellant executed a bail piece…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Commonwealth v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth ex rel. Alberti v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: Gi Nam City of Philadelphia v. Gi Nam Marvin Krasny, Chapter 7 Trustee Frederic Baker, Assistant U. S. Trustee, Trustees City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Gi NamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re: Gi NamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.