Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mayfield

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Capital Bonding Corporation (Capital) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to vacate bad forfeiture after defendant Alonso Mayfield was arrested on new charges in violation of the conditions of a bail bond Capital had posted for Mayfield’s release on existing charges. Capital argues that because the bond was issued principally to secure Mayfield’s appearance, and because Mayfield appeared as required, the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the bail forfeiture based on the new arrest. Following careful consideration of the record in light of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Smith v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. United States v. CiottiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. CulverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. RileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In Re: Hann, R.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API