Legal Opinion

In Re Gi Nam

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 2000No. 00-347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

This bankruptcy appeal raises a close question our Court of Appeals has not yet addressed, namely, whether a bail bond surety’s debt to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania arising from the defendant’s failure to appear is dischargeable in the surety’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy. This question, which implicates uncommonly interesting policy issues, has a personal pun gency here, as the surety is the father of the defendant-son.

I. Background

A. Facts 1

Gi Nam’s son, David Nam, was charged on September 22, 1997 with various offenses, including murder, robbery, and burglary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. Texas (In Re Hickman)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. In Re: Gi Nam City of Philadelphia v. Gi Nam Marvin Krasny, Chapter 7 Trustee Frederic Baker, Assistant U. S. Trustee, Trustees City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re: Gi NamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. In Re: Gi Nam v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API