Legal Opinion

Harabedian v. Zurich Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1963No. Civ. 27282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

This action for declaratory relief involves the interpretation of a comprehensive liability insurance policy issued by appellant, Zurich Insurance Company, to the respondent, Michael T. Harabedian. In the declarations of the policy the limits of liability are expressed as $100,000 for bodily injury to one person and $300,000 for each accident. David T. Harabedian, respondent’s son, was at all material times an additional insured. Two endorsements or riders were attached to the policy, having liability limits expressed as $25,000 for bodily injury to one person and. $50,000 for each accident.

Bo…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Valdez v. Interinsurance Exch. of Auto. Club of S. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Almaden-Santa Clara Vineyards v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API