Freeze-Dry Products, Inc. v. Metro Park Warehouse, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motions for reconsideration (Doc. # 18), for relief from default'judgment (Doc. #22-1) and to file an answer out of time (Doc. #22-2). The court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and is now prepared to rule.
Motion to Reconsider
Defendant seeks reconsideration of our order of November 18, 1994, 159 F.R.D. 45, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process. We held that service one day after the 120-day deadline of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) was reasonable,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Evelyn Hancock v. City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Todd Shipyards Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Auto Transportation, S.A., Intervenor-Appellee v. Turbine Service, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Major v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Renfro v. City of Emporia, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fink v. SwisshelmDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company v. Taylar Deere-Novotny, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026