Legal Opinion
Fink v. Swisshelm
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 5, 1999No. Civ.A. No. 98-2234-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Jay Bey-Woodson’s Motion To Set Aside Entry Of Default (Doc. #37) filed October 16,1998.
Facts
On May 27,1998, Jay Bey-Woodson voluntarily entered an appearance in this action by filing his Notice Of Removal To The United States District Court For The District Of Kansas (Doc. # 1). After removal, defendant did not file an answer or any pre-answer motions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12. Because of defendant’s inaction, the Court entered de*355fault against defendant on July 7, 1998. See (Doc. # 9).
Defendant then filed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clear Link Technologies LLC v. Aspiration Fund Adviser LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- England Logistics Inc v. GV ChamplinesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023