Legal Opinion

Charada Investment Co. v. Trinity Universal Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1936No. 26097. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, O. J.

— Thisaction was instituted for the reformation, and recovery thereon as so reformed, of a burglary insurance policy on a safe and its contents. Its demurrer was overruled, whereupon defendant answered and the cause proceeded to trial. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, following the sustaining1 of a challenge to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s attorney’s opening statement and demurrer thereto. Plaintiff appealed.

Appellant, a domestic corporation, conducted a public market in which it leased space to several persons who…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Lindley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Carter v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Redding v. Puget Sound Iron & Steel WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Johnson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wilkey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. of Baltimore v. BilquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Stone v. National Surety CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Strmich v. Departmet of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API