Legal Opinion

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. McCollum

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 12, 2003No. 1020829PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Tyson Foods, Inc., appeals from the Marshall Circuit Court's judgment entered on a jury verdict against it and in favor of Martha McCollum in her action alleging retaliatory discharge under Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1, a part of the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act. Tyson contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying its motions for judgment as a matter of law, for a new trial, or for a remittitur. We hold that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dale H. Jurgens v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Jules H. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. McClain v. Birmingham Coca-Cola BottlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Teplick v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. Hexcel Decatur, Inc. v. VickersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ex Parte Cit Communication Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ford v. Carylon Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol. v. HollanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API