Legal Opinion

Hexcel Decatur, Inc. v. Vickers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 2005No. 1031447PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Madison Circuit Court denied the motion, filed by Hexcel Decatur, Inc., to dismiss Terry Vickers's retaliatory-discharge claim. Pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., Hexcel Decatur petitioned this Court for permission to appeal the trial court's interlocutory order. We granted that petition, and we affirm the order of the trial court.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On November 6, 2002, while he was employed by Hexcel Decatur, Vickers was injured walking down a flight of stairs on the job. Eight days after the injury, on November 14, 2002, Hexcel Decatur terminated Vickers's employment. On…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Rice v. United Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Carver v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Falls v. JVC America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API