Legal Opinion
Mascika v. Connecticut Tool & Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff, a boy sixteen years old, was employed on March 25th, 1928, by The Connecticut Tool and Engineering Company, one of the defendants, on a power press, starting his work on the press each day at 7:30 a. m. It was necessary to be at the factory prior to 7:30 in order to ring in, place his lunch and hang up his coat and be ready to begin work when the whistle blew. On this day the plaintiff walked to the factory, rang in the time clock about 7:20 and went out into the yard at the rear of the factory to await the blowing of the whistle. The yard was in the joint use of this defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- McNamara v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Stulginski v. Waterbury Rolling Mills Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.