Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Collman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1928No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephaet,

This appeal raises the question whether a judgment may be confessed by an attorney on a copy of a note, the original, containing a power to confess judgment, having been lost, mislaid, stolen or secreted. The pleadings necessary to show the facts will be printed in the statement of facts.

An amicable action and confession of judgment on a note or .other instrument is according to ancient and established practice (Flanigen v. Phila., 51 Pa. 491, 493) existing long before the Act of February 14, 1806, 4 Sm. L. 278, section 28. Under the Act of 1806, a judgment may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eddy v. SmileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Jameson Piano Co. v. EarnestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Sharp v. KeiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Bisbing v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  5. Flanigen v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Compass Technology, Inc. v. Tseng Laboratories, Inc., Wang Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Altoona Trust Co. v. FocklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Greggerson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Wilson v. RichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Wheatcroft v. Albert Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API