Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Richard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1929No. Appeal 131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the refusal to strike off a judgment entered by confession. Plaintiff filed a statement in the court below averring that defendant, on May 21, 1914, executed and delivered to him a promissory note payable six months after date, with interest and attorney’s fees, which obligation had not been paid; that the note contained “a warrant......authorizing any attorney of any court......to appear for [defendant] and confess judgment against him.” The statement averred that a copy of the note was attached, and the record shows this to be the fact. The petition to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Banning v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  3. Hutchinson v. LedlieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Altoona Trust Co. v. FocklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Ankeny, Admr. v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Crane v. Harris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1946
  4. Lathrem v. ForemanMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1957
  5. Longacre v. Breisch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API