Eddy v. Smiley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 153, April T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Crawford Co., making absolute rule to strike off judgment in case of R. G. Eddy v. M. M. Smiley. Rule to strike off judgment. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
Judgment was entered by confession against the defendant in favor of R. G. Eddy individually, as the only plaintiff. The defendant presented a petition setting forth, among other things : “ That the contract or lease upon which the judgment *319had' been entered was not a contract made by the defendant with the plaintiff,” and upon her motion the judgment was stricken off. The record showed a warrant of attorney from the defendant to confess judgment in favor of “The R. G. Eddy Marble & Granite Company, of Meadville,” and in the agreement in which that warrant was embodied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abrams v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Weaver v. McDevittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Lytle v. ColtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Summy v. HiestandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
3Cited by16 opinions
- Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Mahoney v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Oberlin v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Ulick v. Vibration Specialty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- International Harvester Co. v. Tuscarora TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.