Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2278 C.D. 1979,PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Durrell A. Chappell (petitioner), the owner-operator of the DAC Community Service of Reading and Berks County (DAC), appeals here from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) *19which directed him to secure a certificate of public convenience.

Michael F. Feeney, a partner in the Reading Area Medi-Taxi (Reading), filed a complaint with the PUC regarding advertisements in which the DAC had announced the expanding of its emergency and non-emergency medical transportation to include transportation of ambulatory, wheelchair-confined, handicapped and elderly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re The Appeal of Neshaminy Auto Villa Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Longo Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Summit School, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Delaware Valley Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. KlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Carol Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API