Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. City of St. Paul

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

This case was fairly presented to the jury, and the evidence warranted the verdict rendered, provided there was no error of law committed by the court. It appeared from the evidence that there was a pile of lumber near the center of Chestnut street, in the city of St. Paul, at a point between the crossing of several railroad tracks and the Mississippi river. The plaintiff’s intestate, driving a horse and wagon on this street, towards the river, had passed the tracks, when his horse, frightened by tho whistle of a locomotive, became unmanageable, and, coming in contact with this pile of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Russell v. Inhabitants of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Requa v. . the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Rehberg v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. City of Logansport v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Village of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. City of Huntington v. McClurgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. City of Raton v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  4. Schafer v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API