Legal Opinion
City of Huntington v. McClurg
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1899No. 2,811PublishedCited by 2 opinions
From tibe. Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.
— The appellee, Rachel A. McClurg, brought her action against the appellant to recover damages for a personal injury suffered by the appellee from falling upon a defective sidewalk.
The overruling of a motion to make the complaint more specific is assigned as error. After the motion was overruled, an amended complaint was filed, and thereafter no motion to make the complaint more specific was filed. The amended complaint is the only complaint in the transcript of the record. The complaint which was before the trial court when the motion was overruled is not before us, and therefore this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sewell v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- City of Columbus v. StrassnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Saulsbury v. . Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KeeleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Tipton v. FreemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909