Legal Opinion

State v. Colbert

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 67A84PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

This appeal is before us upon the single issue of whether defendant’s right to counsel was violated during the jury selection process. We find that it was and that defendant is entitled to a new trial. We accordingly reverse the Court of Appeals.

Defendant was tried and convicted on a proper bill of indictment charging him with felonious possession of marijuana. A voir dire hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress was conducted on the day before the jury trial commenced. The transcript discloses that Mr. Bill Allen of Yadkinville was present, representing defendant at this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. FryeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. In re L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API