Legal Opinion
Korovilas v. Bon Ton Renovating Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1945No. 33,923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Certiorari brings for review an order of the industrial commission reversing the findings and award of compensation of a referee.
In this case, as in Bendix v. Bendix Co. 217 Minn. 489, 14 N. W. (2d) 464, the question is whether at the time' of relator’s injury he occupied the status of an employer or that of an employe.
The controlling finding of the commission, upon which its order is founded, is thus stated:
“That on June 6, 1943, Arist Korovilas was not an employe of the Bon Ton Renovating Co., Inc.”
The facts are these: Three brothers, Arist (relator), Nick, and Hus,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bendix v. the Bendix Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hansen v. Terminal Manufacturing Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Shillinglaw v. Owen Shillinglaw Fuel CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Pederson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Delaney v. Dan Delaney, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.