Hansen v. Terminal Manufacturing Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This case comes here on a writ of certiorari from the industrial commission, which rejected the relator’s claim to compensation on the ground that the relationship of employer and employe did not exist between him and the Terminal Manufacturing Company. It is conceded that under our decisions in the cases of Donaldson v. William H. B. Donaldson Co. 176 Minn. 422, 223 N. W. 772; Erick-son v. Erickson Furniture Co. 179 Minn. 304, 229 N. W. 101; and Benson v. Hygienic Artificial Ice Co. 198 Minn. 250, 269 N. W. 460; and Walsh v. Mankato Oil Co. 201 Minn. 58, 275 N. W. 377, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Donaldson v. William H. B. Donaldson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Erickson v. Erickson Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Benson v. Hygienic Artificial Ice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Walsh v. Mankato Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3Cited by2 opinions
- Korovilas v. Bon Ton Renovating Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Bendix v. the Bendix Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944