Legal Opinion
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2014No. 2013-0091 and 2013-0203PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} We accepted a conflict certified to us by the Ninth District Court of Appeals on the following question: “Whether Section 1335.05 of the Ohio Revised Code prohibits a party from raising as a defense that the parties to a contract involving an interest in land orally agreed to modify the terms of their agreement.” FirstMerit Bank v. Inks, 135 Ohio St.3d 1410, 2013-Ohio-1622, 986 N.E.2d 28.
{¶ 2} We also accepted a discretionary appeal filed by FirstMerit Bank on the following proposition of law: “A party cannot use Civ.R. 60(B) to enforce an alleged oral forbearance agreement when the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- James B. Nutter & Co. v. Estate of NeiferOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ma v. GomezOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Blain's Folding Serv., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. O'MalleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.